# What will be the 51st state in Trump's term?

During Trump's term

Updated: March 26, 2026

Category: Politics

Tags: Trump

HTML: /markets/politics/trump/what-will-be-the-51st-state-in-trump-s-term/

## Short Answer

**Key takeaway.** The **model** sees potential mispricing for Puerto Rico at **24.7%** **model** vs **4.0%** **market**, suggesting its historically developed statehood movement makes it the most plausible candidate for becoming the 51st state during Trump's term.

## Key Claims (January 2026)

**- - Prospects for a 51st state during Trump's term remain highly improbable.** - Puerto Rico has the most developed statehood movement despite Senate hurdles.
- DC statehood faces strong Democratic support but firm presidential opposition.
- Trump's suggestions for Canada, Venezuela, or Greenland were purely rhetorical.
- No congressional chairs currently plan markups for any statehood admission.

### Why This Matters (GEO)

- AI agents extract claims, not arguments.
- Improves citation probability in summaries and answer cards.
- Enables fact stitching across multiple sources.

## Executive Verdict

**Key takeaway.** **Model** (**12.6%**) at 2c **market** price implies 50x payout given low **probability** for any 51st state.

### Who Wins and Why

| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Greenland | 3.0% | 18.7% | Trump previously expressed interest in buying Greenland, but Denmark firmly rejected the idea. |
| Canada | 3.0% | 18.7% | No serious proposals or political will exist for Canada to become the 51st U.S. state. |
| Puerto Rico | 4.0% | 24.7% | Puerto Rico has the most developed statehood movement and prior House passage, despite significant Senate hurdles. |

## Model vs Market

| Outcome | Market Probability | Octagon Model Probability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Greenland | 3.0% | 18.7% |
| Canada | 3.0% | 18.7% |
| Puerto Rico | 4.0% | 24.7% |
| Venezuela | 1.0% | 6.3% |
| District of Columbia | 2.0% | 12.6% |
| Guam | 2.0% | 12.6% |
| Colombia | 1.0% | 6.3% |

- Expiration: January 20, 2029

## Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

The price action for this market has been confined to a very narrow sideways channel, trading between 1.0% and 2.0% probability. The chart indicates that 1.0% has acted as a firm support level, while the current price of 2.0% represents the primary resistance. The market began at the low end of this range and has since doubled to the top, but this move still reflects an extremely low perceived probability of the event occurring. There have been no significant breakouts or volatile swings; instead, the market demonstrates a stable, albeit very low, valuation.

The slight upward trend from 1.0% to 2.0% around March 21st can be attributed to President Trump's repeated public comments about potential statehood for Canada or Venezuela. While the provided context suggests these proposals are politically infeasible, the market has priced in a marginal, nominal risk in response to the President's ongoing rhetoric. The increase in trading volume accompanying the price rise, with a recent data point showing 71 contracts traded, suggests a mild increase in trader conviction or interest at the 2.0% resistance level. However, the overall low volume and tight price range indicate that most participants are not taking these proposals as serious policy initiatives.

Overall, the chart reflects a strong market consensus that no 51st state will be admitted during the specified term. The sentiment is overwhelmingly bearish, with the 2.0% price ceiling indicating that even under the most optimistic speculative scenarios, traders assign only a 1-in-50 chance to the outcome. The sideways movement within this tight band suggests the market has found a stable equilibrium, viewing the possibility as highly improbable and largely unresponsive to news that isn't a concrete legislative or political development.

## Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to "Yes" if Puerto Rico becomes the 51st U.S. state before January 20, 2029, with the outcome verified by the Library of Congress; otherwise, it resolves to "No." The market opened on January 9, 2025, and will close either upon the outcome occurring or by January 20, 2029, at 10:00 AM EST, with projected payouts 30 minutes after closing. This event is mutually exclusive with other potential 51st states, and trading is prohibited for employees of source agencies or individuals with material, non-public information.

## Market Discussion

Traders overwhelmingly believe it is highly improbable that any of the listed options—Puerto Rico, Canada, or Greenland—will become the 51st U.S. state during Trump's term, as evidenced by their strong "No" positions and the extremely low "Yes" probabilities (3-4%). While some users lightly speculate on Canada's annexation due to historical rhetoric, the dominant sentiment is that no new state will be added. A notable discussion also arose regarding the interpretation of the "mutually exclusive" market rule, with some questioning if it permits hypothetical scenarios involving combined territories.

## Market Data

| Contract | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | Last Price | Volume | Open Interest |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Canada | 2% | 2.7% | 2.7% | $122,825.33 | $59,238.03 |
| Colombia | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.3% | $23,518.9 | $17,737 |
| District of Columbia | 0.5% | 1.4% | 0.5% | $45,853.12 | $24,084.17 |
| Greenland | 2.4% | 4% | 2.3% | $289,427.13 | $119,230.77 |
| Guam | 0.4% | 1.3% | 0.3% | $23,094.6 | $16,072 |
| Puerto Rico | 4% | 5% | 4% | $111,553.81 | $62,727.01 |
| Venezuela | 0.5% | 1.7% | 1.8% | $131,713.79 | $34,557.03 |

## Do House, Senate Chairs Plan Statehood Admission Bill Markups Soon?

House Chair Markup Timeline | Not before Q1 2028 [[^]](https://naturalresources.house.gov/about/chairman.htm) |
Senate Chair Markup Timeline | Not before Q1 2028 [[^]](https://www.energy.senate.gov/) |
House Chair on Puerto Rico Statehood | Opposed past bills; requires fiscal stability [[^]](https://www.pr51st.com/rep-bruce-westerman-and-the-puerto-rico-status-act/) |

**Neither House Committee on Natural Resources Chair Bruce Westerman (R-AR) nor Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee (R-UT) has expressed willingness to schedule a formal markup session for any statehood admission bill before the first quarter of 2028**

Neither House Committee on Natural Resources Chair Bruce Westerman (R-AR) nor Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee (R-UT) has expressed willingness to schedule a formal markup session for any statehood admission bill before the first quarter of 2028. There are no public or private statements from either chair indicating such a willingness during this timeframe [[^]](https://naturalresources.house.gov/about/chairman.htm).

House Natural Resources Chair Bruce Westerman has opposed Puerto Rico status bills in the past. His opposition stemmed from concerns over the process and the territory's fiscal stability [[^]](https://www.pr51st.com/rep-bruce-westerman-and-the-puerto-rico-status-act/). He has also explicitly stated that Puerto Rico must achieve fiscal stability before its statehood can be considered [[^]](https://intertest.elnuevodia.com/english/news/story/bruce-westerman-reaffirms-that-puerto-rico-must-resolve-its-fiscal-stability-before-statehood/). Committee records from the House Natural Resources Committee do not indicate any recent markups concerning statehood admission bills [[^]](https://www.govtrack.us/congress/committees/HSII).

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chair Mike Lee has not given any positive signals regarding his willingness to schedule markups for statehood admission bills. This includes potential bills concerning areas like Washington D.C. or Puerto Rico, with no such indications before the first quarter of 2028 [[^]](https://www.energy.senate.gov/).

## Is USTR Linking Political Union to USMCA Trade Concessions?

USTR Stance on Political Union | No explicit evidence linking trade/Arctic concessions to political union in USMCA talks [[^]](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/march/united-states-and-mexico-launch-review-process-usmca) |
Primary USMCA Review Focus | Tariffs, rules of origin, dairy access, supply chains [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/business/canadian-minister-us-canada-trade-meet-us-trade-chief-washington-2026-03-06/) |
Former President Trump's Remarks | Personal political statements, not USTR conditions for USMCA [[^]](https://cbc.ca/news/politics/cusma-review-2026-what-trump-wants-9.7026216) |

**No explicit USTR link exists between political union and trade concessions**

No explicit USTR link exists between political union and trade concessions. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has not explicitly linked specific concessions on trade tariffs or Arctic sovereignty to a potential future political union with Canada during back-channel talks for the 2026 USMCA review. Public and official discussions, including USTR press releases and official reports, primarily involve ongoing dialogues with Mexico and Canada focused on standard trade matters such as tariffs, rules of origin, dairy access, and ensuring robust supply chains [[^]](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/march/united-states-and-mexico-launch-review-process-usmca). These official communications do not reference any discussion of political union or linking it to trade or Arctic concessions [[^]](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/march/united-states-and-mexico-launch-review-process-usmca).

The 2026 USMCA review primarily addresses existing economic and trade issues. This review process officially commenced with Mexico in March 2026, focusing on addressing existing trade agreements and potential updates [[^]](https://ustr.gov/about/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2026/march/united-states-and-mexico-launch-review-process-usmca). Discussions held with Canadian officials have been described as constructive, concentrating on economic and trade issues [[^]](https://www.reuters.com/business/canadian-minister-us-canada-trade-meet-us-trade-chief-washington-2026-03-06/). USTR officials and trade experts anticipate the review will delve into areas like auto rules, access for U.S. farmers, and securing critical supply chains [[^]](https://sourcingjournal.com/topics/trade/ustr-jamieson-greer-usmca-trade-renegotiation-mexico-canada-1234793052/). While the possibility of separate deals emerging with Mexico and Canada exists, these documented priorities do not include a political union with Canada [[^]](https://sourcingjournal.com/topics/trade/ustr-jamieson-greer-usmca-trade-renegotiation-mexico-canada-1234793052/).

Former President Trump's "51st state" remarks are personal, not USTR policy. While former President Trump has publicly discussed the concept of Canada becoming the "51st state," connecting this possibility to issues like tariffs and Arctic defense, these remarks are personal political statements [[^]](https://cbc.ca/news/politics/cusma-review-2026-what-trump-wants-9.7026216). They are not explicitly linked by the USTR as conditions or concessions within the framework of the ongoing 2026 USMCA review talks. The absence of formal governmental action or USTR linking trade negotiations to such a political outcome is also reflected in prediction markets [[^]](https://thehub.ca/2025/10/01/trump-revives-51st-state-talk-annexation-threat-security-deal-explainer/).

## Are Puerto Rico's Debt Restructuring Plans Contingent on Statehood?

Primary Debt Restructuring Concluded | 2022 [[^]](https://oversightboard.pr.gov/debt/) |
Original Debt Reduced | Over $70 billion [[^]](https://oversightboard.pr.gov/debt/) |
Oversight Authority | FOMB under PROMESA Act [[^]](https://oversightboard.pr.gov/debt/) |

**No proposals for a statehood-contingent debt restructuring plan have been circulated among the U.S**

No proposals for a statehood-contingent debt restructuring plan have been circulated among the U.S. Treasury, the Puerto Rico Fiscal Oversight Board (PROMESA), and major bondholder groups. Puerto Rico's primary debt restructuring, overseen by the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico (FOMB) under the PROMESA act, concluded in 2022 with the confirmation of a Plan of Adjustment [[^]](https://oversightboard.pr.gov/debt/). This process successfully reduced the island's public debt from over **$70** billion to more manageable levels [[^]](https://oversightboard.pr.gov/debt/). While major bondholder groups like Aurelius participated in these proceedings and related legal challenges, the agreements did not include statehood as a contingency [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Oversight_and_Management_Board_for_Puerto_Rico_v._Aurelius_Investment,_LLC). The U.S. Treasury's involvement in this context has primarily focused on federal financial stability rather than statehood-linked debt plans [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico_Oversight,_Management,_and_Economic_Stability_Act).

Discussions on statehood remain separate from Puerto Rico's financial restructuring efforts. Discussions regarding Puerto Rico's potential statehood remain distinct from its concluded debt restructuring efforts [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rican_government-debt_crisis). Similarly, ongoing financial initiatives, such as the restructuring of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) debt, are being managed within the existing PROMESA framework without any connection to the island's political status [[^]](https://uat.apnews.com/article/puerto-rico-power-company-debt-board-blackrock-620450990cfc0f867a5332894272bf6c). Publicly available information confirms that no proposals linking debt relief or restructuring to statehood are currently circulating in these negotiations, which involve the FOMB and various creditors [[^]](https://uat.apnews.com/article/puerto-rico-power-company-debt-board-blackrock-620450990cfc0f867a5332894272bf6c).

## Did INDOPACOM Recommend Guam Statehood for US Military Basing Rights?

Classified Assessment Recommendation | No public evidence of INDOPACOM assessment recommending Guam statehood for military basing rights [Web Research Results] [[^]](https://www.postguam.com/news/local/national-security-strategy-has-guam-at-center-of-us-defense/article_73c7b4d4-c83a-4c10-9097-58cb4c3286a2.html) |
Guam's Strategic Role | Central to U.S. defense plans, elevated for 2025 and 2026 [[^]](https://www.postguam.com/news/local/national-security-strategy-has-guam-at-center-of-us-defense/article_73c7b4d4-c83a-4c10-9097-58cb4c3286a2.html) |
Guam Statehood Probability | Low or negligible in near-term prediction markets for 51st state [[^]](https://manifold.markets/strutheo/what-will-be-the-51st-state-of-the) |

**No public evidence supports a classified INDOPACOM assessment on Guam statehood**

No public evidence supports a classified INDOPACOM assessment on Guam statehood. Publicly available information, including various reports and news articles, does not reference a specific classified assessment provided by the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) to the National Security Council that recommends statehood for Guam. Such a document would specifically aim to secure long-term military basing rights as a counter to Chinese regional influence.

Guam holds significant strategic importance for U.S. defense in the Indo-Pacific. Despite the absence of the specific classified assessment, Guam's role is widely acknowledged, with the National Security Strategy placing the territory at the center of U.S. defense plans and elevating its importance for 2025 and 2026 [[^]](https://www.postguam.com/news/local/national-security-strategy-has-guam-at-center-of-us-defense/article_73c7b4d4-c83a-4c10-9097-58cb4c3286a2.html). Some foreign policy analysts and local politicians have publicly argued that granting Guam statehood could serve as a 'foreign-policy masterstroke against China' and an 'only path to survival' to enhance security amid regional tensions [[^]](https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/14/counter-china-by-making-guam-a-state/).

Statehood discussions also encompass decolonization and face local opposition. These discussions also frame statehood as a path to decolonization and enhanced security [[^]](https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/pacific/guam-statehood-decolonization-03142025040420.html), though local bodies like the Commission on Decolonization have raised concerns about this perspective [[^]](https://www.guampdn.com/news/only-path-to-survival-senator-eyes-guam-becoming-51st-state-commission-on-decolonization-raises-concern/article_cac22492-ffde-11ef-849f-871cf548e2b3.html). In broader contexts, prediction markets for the 51st U.S. state typically show low or negligible probabilities for Guam, especially when compared to other locations such as Puerto Rico or Washington D.C. [[^]](https://manifold.markets/strutheo/what-will-be-the-51st-state-of-the).

## Are Grand Bargains for DC, Puerto Rico Statehood Being Floated?

Grand Bargain Status | No current inter-party 'grand bargain' proposals being floated [[^]](https://thorsforge.substack.com/p/statehood-for-dc-and-puerto-rico) |
DC Statehood Approach | Pursued via standalone Democratic legislative initiatives, e.g., Washington, D.C. Admission Act [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington,_D.C.,_Admission_Act) |
Puerto Rico Statehood Approach | Advocates continue efforts, highlighted by events like the Puerto Rico Equality and Statehood Summit [[^]](https://www.pr51st.com/puerto-rico-equality-and-statehood-summit-2026/) |

**No concrete inter-party 'grand bargain' proposals currently exist in Congress**

No concrete inter-party 'grand bargain' proposals currently exist in Congress. Senior leadership in Congress is not presently floating 'grand bargain' proposals that pair the admission of likely Democratic-leaning states like D.C. or Puerto Rico with major Republican priorities such as splitting a large red state or passing nationwide election integrity laws [[^]](https://thorsforge.substack.com/p/statehood-for-dc-and-puerto-rico). Instead, legislative efforts for statehood for Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico are predominantly advanced through standalone Democratic initiatives, which encounter significant opposition from Republicans [[^]](https://thorsforge.substack.com/p/statehood-for-dc-and-puerto-rico).

Statehood initiatives are currently standalone Democratic efforts, facing Republican opposition. These efforts are typically embodied in distinct bills sponsored by Democrats, such as the Washington, D.C. Admission Act for D.C. and ongoing advocacy like the Puerto Rico Equality and Statehood Summit for Puerto Rico [[^]](https://www.pr51st.com/puerto-rico-equality-and-statehood-summit-2026/). Republican leadership has actively opposed these initiatives, preventing them from becoming part of broader bipartisan compromises. While historical precedents for 'grand bargains' exist in U.S. history, including the Compromise of 1790 and the Compromise of 1850, there is no current evidence of similar negotiations for D.C. or Puerto Rico statehood [[^]](https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/another_blow_to_statehood_puerto_rico_s_political_reality_is_changing.html). Statehood for these territories remains a partisan issue, lacking bipartisan 'grand bargain' discussions [[^]](https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/another_blow_to_statehood_puerto_rico_s_political_reality_is_changing.html).

## What Could Change the Odds

**As of March 26, 2026, no 51st state has been admitted during Donald Trump's presidential term [[^]](https://www.politico.eu/article/us-donald-trump-says-great-idea-to-make-canada-the-51st-state-justin-trudeau/).** While Trump has jokingly floated ideas like Canada, Venezuela, or Greenland, these suggestions have remained purely rhetorical with no legislative progress [[^]](https://newsweek.com/donald-trump-canada-state-washington-dc-puerto-rico-2011296). Prediction markets reflect this stagnation, with Manifold giving Puerto Rico a **49%** chance and Washington D.C [[^]](https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-suggests-bonkers-plan-venezuela-132027449.html). a **25%** chance of overall statehood, but with low odds (1-**8%**) for any specific admission in the near future [[^]](https://newrepublic.com/post/207845/donald-trump-venezuela-51-state). Similarly, Kalshi and Polymarket indicate very low probabilities for additions like Venezuela (**3%**) or Greenland (**8%**) during a Trump era [[^]](https://kalshi.com/markets/kxstate51/51st-state-/kxstate51-29). The path to statehood for any territory requires congressional approval [[^]](https://manifold.markets/strutheo/what-will-be-the-51st-state-of-the). Historically, bills for Puerto Rico and D.C [[^]](https://poly.**market**/8208HhX). statehood have passed the House in previous Congresses but subsequently stalled in the Senate [[^]](https://kalshi.com/markets/kxstate/51st-us-state). Currently, there has been no advancement on these statehood efforts under the Trump administration, signifying a lack of immediate legislative catalysts for a 51st state [[^]](https://news.kalshi.com/p/trump-greenland-takeover-**market**-odds).

## Key Dates & Catalysts

- **Expiration:** January 20, 2029
- **Closes:** January 20, 2029

## Decision-Flipping Events

- As of March 26, 2026, no 51st state has been admitted during Donald Trump's presidential term [^] .
- While Trump has jokingly floated ideas like Canada, Venezuela, or Greenland, these suggestions have remained purely rhetorical with no legislative progress [^] .
- Prediction markets reflect this stagnation, with Manifold giving Puerto Rico a **49%** chance and Washington D.C [^] .
- A **25%** chance of overall statehood, but with low odds (1-**8%**) for any specific admission in the near future [^] .

## Related Research Reports

- [EU has a new member before 2030?](/markets/politics/international/eu-has-a-new-member-before-2030/)
- [Will Trump's birthright citizenship order come into effect?](/markets/politics/scotus-courts/will-trump-s-birthright-citizenship-order-come-into-effect/)
- [Will Trump create a $250 bill featuring himself?](/markets/politics/congress/will-trump-create-a-250-bill-featuring-himself/)
- [Will Israel and Qatar normalize relations before 2027?](/markets/politics/international/will-israel-and-qatar-normalize-relations-before-2027/)

## Historical Resolutions

No historical resolution data available for this series.

## Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice.
Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
We are not affiliated with Kalshi or any prediction market platform. Market data may be delayed or incomplete.

### Data Sources & Model Transparency

**Data Sources:** Octagon Deep Research aggregates information from multiple sources including news, filings, and market data.

**Freshness:** Analysis is generated periodically and may not reflect the latest developments. Verify critical information from primary sources.

## Attribution Policy

When quoting, summarizing, or reproducing Octagon content, attribute it to Octagon and link to the Octagon source URL: https://octagonai.co/markets/politics/trump/what-will-be-the-51st-state-in-trump-s-term
If a specific page was used, cite that page rather than only the site homepage.