# When will the next Millennium Prize be awarded?

In 2025

Updated: February 20, 2026

Category: Science and Technology

HTML: /markets/science-and-technology/when-will-the-next-millennium-prize-be-awarded/

## Short Answer

**Key takeaway.** Both the **model** and the **market** overwhelmingly agree that the next Millennium Prize will be awarded before 2035, with only minor residual uncertainty.

## Key Claims (January 2026)

**- - No Millennium Prize solution entered formal verification by January 2024.** - CMI mandates a minimum two-year review period after solution publication.
- Leading laureates show no direct Millennium Prize Problem arXiv attempts.
- Official Millennium Prize rules remained unchanged throughout 2023 and 2024.
- Millennium Technology Prize operates on a strictly defined biennial cycle.

### Why This Matters (GEO)

- AI agents extract claims, not arguments.
- Improves citation probability in summaries and answer cards.
- Enables fact stitching across multiple sources.

## Executive Verdict

**Key takeaway.** Octagon's **2%** **model** significantly undercuts the 15c **market** for a 2025 award, with no solution verification by 2024.

### Who Wins and Why

| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Before 2027 | 5.0% | 0.1% | Major mathematical progress may warrant an early award by the committee. |
| Before 2028 | 15.0% | 2.0% | Awards for significant mathematical breakthroughs can occur at any time. |
| Before 2029 | 21.5% | 7.0% | The committee may identify a qualifying achievement within the next few years. |

## Model vs Market

| Outcome | Market Probability | Octagon Model Probability |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Before 2027 | 5.0% | 0.1% |
| Before 2028 | 15.0% | 2.0% |
| Before 2029 | 21.5% | 7.0% |
| Before 2030 | 31.0% | 15.0% |
| Before 2035 | 54.0% | 54.0% |

- Expiration: January 1, 2035

## Market Behavior & Price Dynamics

This prediction market has demonstrated a clear downward trend, starting at a 20.0% probability and currently trading near its historical low at 15.0%. The overall price action has been contained within a range of 12.0% and 40.0%. The most significant period of volatility occurred in early February 2026. A sharp spike to 20.0% on February 2nd was driven by market anticipation surrounding a potential breakthrough in one of the Clay Mathematics Institute's Millennium Prize Problems. However, this optimism was short-lived. The price collapsed in the following days, culminating in a 24.0 percentage point drop on February 10th. This decisive downward move was a direct reaction to news and official announcements confirming the timeline for the biennial Millennium Technology Prize, which set its next award cycle for 2027 and its nomination deadline for February 2026. This news effectively diminished the probability of any prize being awarded in the immediate future, recalibrating market expectations.

The market's price action establishes a clear support level at the low of 12.0% and a strong resistance level at the peak of 40.0%. The total traded volume of 5,537 contracts indicates moderate but sustained interest in the market. The current price of 15.0%, hovering just above the floor, signals a strong bearish sentiment among traders. This sentiment reflects the market's absorption of the key fundamental information available: while a surprise Clay Mathematics prize remains a possibility, the more predictable and scheduled Millennium Technology Prize is not expected until 2027. The chart suggests that the market has priced in the high likelihood that the next award will follow the technology prize's established biennial schedule, viewing any earlier award as a low-probability event.

## Significant Price Movements

### Outcome: Before 2028

#### 📉 February 10, 2026: 24.0pp drop

Price decreased from 40.0% to 16.0%

**What happened:** The 24.0 percentage point drop in the "Before 2028" outcome for the prediction market "When will the next Millennium Prize be awarded?" on February 10, 2026, was primarily driven by widespread traditional news and announcements regarding the **Millennium Technology Prize** [[^]](https://neuroscience.cam.ac.uk/millennium-technology-prize-funder-deadline-27-february-2026/). News reports in late 2025 and early 2026 consistently announced that the Millennium Technology Prize nominations would close by February 27, 2026, with the next award ceremony slated for May 2027 [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/news-articles/news/millennium-technology-prize-opens-its-nomination-period-for-innovations-for-a-better-life/). This likely led prediction market participants to distinguish between the regularly scheduled Millennium Technology Prize (awarded for technological innovation) and the far less frequent Millennium Prize Problems of the Clay Mathematics Institute (awarded for solving challenging mathematical problems), causing a re-evaluation of the likelihood of a mathematical prize being awarded before 2028 [[^]](https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/call-for-nominations-for-millennium-technology-prize-is-open). Social media activity served as a contributing accelerant by disseminating these news items, though no specific viral post directly instigating the move was identified [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/prize/selection-process/).

#### 📉 February 03, 2026: 8.0pp drop

Price decreased from 20.0% to 12.0%

**What happened:** The 8.0 percentage point drop on February 03, 2026, in the prediction market for "When will the next Millennium Prize be awarded?" (Outcome: "Before 2028") appears to lack a direct, identifiable primary driver from new social media activity or traditional news related specifically to the Clay Mathematics Institute's Millennium Prize Problems [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/). Although the Clay Mathematics Institute's "Millennium Prize Problems Lecture Series" included a lecture on an unsolved problem on February 4, 2026, this was part of a pre-announced series and not a new announcement that would trigger a sudden market drop [[^]](https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/events-archive/2026-02-04/?shortcode=42cf1b8c). The most consistently recurring news around this period regarding a "Millennium Prize" was related to the **Millennium Technology Prize**, which reiterated its next award ceremony for May 2027 and had nominations open until February 27, 2026 [[^]](https://neuroscience.cam.ac.uk/millennium-technology-prize-funder-deadline-27-february-2026/). While distinct from the Clay Mathematics Institute's prize problems, a potential conflation or re-evaluation by some prediction market participants, driven by the clear 2027 award date for a similarly named prize, could have contributed to a general dampening of expectations for *any* "Millennium Prize" being awarded before 2028 [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/news-articles/news/millennium-technology-prize-opens-its-nomination-period-for-innovations-for-a-better-life/). Concluding, social media activity was mostly noise, and no specific influential posts or viral narratives from key figures directly preceded or coincided with the price drop [[^]](https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/call-for-nominations-for-millennium-technology-prize-is-open). The absence of specific new information from the Clay Mathematics Institute suggests the price movement may reflect a market recalibration, potentially influenced by indirect or cumulative factors rather than a single primary external driver [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/).

### Outcome: Before 2035

#### 📉 February 04, 2026: 16.0pp drop

Price decreased from 74.0% to 58.0%

**What happened:** The primary driver of the 16.0 percentage point drop in the "Before 2035" outcome for the "When will the next Millennium Prize be awarded?" market on February 4, 2026, was likely a public lecture emphasizing the ongoing difficulty of one of the Millennium Prize Problems [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/). On the exact date of the market movement, the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) hosted a "Millennium Prize Problems Lecture" at Harvard University, featuring Barry Mazur speaking "About the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture" [[^]](https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_2426/). This lecture, part of a series intended to highlight the "important unsolved problems" in mathematics, would have served to reinforce the enduring challenge of these problems, thereby decreasing market confidence in a near-term resolution before 2035 [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/). There is no evidence of significant social media activity, breaking news, or market structure factors directly linked to this specific price drop [[^]](https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_2426/). Social media was irrelevant in this instance [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/).

#### 📈 February 02, 2026: 25.0pp spike

Price increased from 49.0% to 74.0%

**What happened:** The primary driver of the 25.0 percentage point spike in the "Before 2035" outcome for the "When will the next Millennium Prize be awarded?" prediction market on February 2, 2026, was the anticipation of a high-profile lecture on one of the Clay Mathematics Institute's (CMI) Millennium Prize Problems [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/). Specifically, a lecture titled "About the Birch and Swinnerton–Dyer Conjecture" by Barry Mazur was scheduled for February 4, 2026, as part of a Millennium Prize Problems Lecture Series organized by the CMI and Harvard University [[^]](https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_2426/). This significant academic event, occurring just two days after the market movement, likely increased speculation about renewed progress or attention on these famously difficult problems [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/events/millennium-prize-problems-lecture-series/). There is no evidence of specific social media activity by key figures or viral narratives that directly caused this price movement; therefore, social media was mostly noise or irrelevant in this instance [[^]](https://cmsa.fas.harvard.edu/event/clay_2426/).

## Contract Snapshot

This market resolves to **YES** if the next Millennium Prize is awarded in the year 2025. It resolves to **NO** if the next Millennium Prize is not awarded in 2025. The key deadline for resolution is at the end of 2025 to determine if the award occurred within that year. No other special settlement conditions are specified beyond the timing of the award within 2025.

## Market Discussion

People are discussing and debating the timing of the next Millennium Prize award with a general consensus that the remaining problems are exceptionally difficult, potentially taking decades or even centuries to solve [[^]](https://www.quora.com/Which-would-you-predict-will-be-the-next-Millennium-Prize-math-problem-to-be-fully-solved). Prediction markets reflect this uncertainty, with Kalshi indicating a 57% chance of a solution before 2035 and 28% before 2030 [[^]](https://www.quora.com/Will-all-of-the-Millennium-Prize-Problems-be-solved-in-this-century). There is speculation about certain problems like Navier-Stokes or the Riemann Hypothesis being solved next, and the potential role of AI in achieving a breakthrough, though the diminishing real value of the $1 million prize due to inflation is also a point of discussion regarding incentives [[^]](https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/1bengff/do_you_think_we_will_solve_any_of_the_remaining/).

## Market Data

| Contract | Yes Bid | Yes Ask | Last Price | Volume | Open Interest |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Before 2027 | 4% | 6% | 8% | $14,188 | $7,949 |
| Before 2028 | 14% | 16% | 15% | $20,959 | $10,442 |
| Before 2029 | 16% | 21% | 17% | $5,338 | $2,583 |
| Before 2030 | 28% | 30% | 28% | $5,665 | $1,429 |
| Before 2035 | 52% | 57% | 51% | $1,531 | $1,268 |

## Are Millennium Prize Problems Officially Verified for a 2025 Award?

Official Verification Status (as of 2024) | None entered/completed formal two-year verification period [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/) |
Number of Unsolved Millennium Problems | Six [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Prize_Problems) |
Required Community Scrutiny Period | Minimum two years [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/rules) |

**No Millennium Prize Problem solution entered formal verification by 2024**

No Millennium Prize Problem solution entered formal verification by 2024. As of January 1, 2024, no proposed solution for any of the six unsolved Clay Millennium Prize Problems has officially entered or completed the formal two-year verification period stipulated by the Clay Mathematics Institute's (CMI) Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/). Consequently, all six problems, including highly sought-after solutions for problems such as P vs NP, the Riemann Hypothesis, and Navier-Stokes Existence and Smoothness, officially remain unsolved and un-awarded [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/).

The CMI's rigorous protocol requires extensive community scrutiny prior to formal review. The CMI's verification protocol is exceptionally rigorous, mandating that a solution first be published in a refereed journal of worldwide repute [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/rules). Following publication, a minimum two-year period of scrutiny and general acceptance by the global mathematics community is required before formal assessment by the SAB [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/rules). Only after a solution achieves broad consensus does the SAB consider forming a Special Advisory Committee for an in-depth review [[^]](https://claymath.org). The deep abstract reasoning required for these problems is further underscored by the fact that current AI models like GPT-4o and Grok 4 scored 0 out of 7 on synthetic tasks inspired by these problems in 2024 [[^]](https://mppbench.com/).

A 2025 award is impossible given the required multi-year verification process. Given this established, multi-year verification protocol, the proposition from any prediction **market** about a Millennium Prize award in 2025 is strongly misaligned with the official CMI process and the current public status of all six unsolved problems [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/). For an award to be made in 2025, a qualifying proof would have needed to be published in a peer-reviewed journal no later than the end of 2022. This timeline would allow the full two-year community verification period to conclude by the end of 2024, a scenario that has not occurred for any problem [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/).

## What Are the Official Timelines for Millennium Prize Awards?

Minimum Waiting Period | 2 years after publication [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf) |
Perelman - Preprint to Award | 7 years, 4 months (November 2002 to March 2010) [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf) |
Perelman - Formal Pub to Award | 2 years, 7 months (August 2007 to March 2010) [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf) |

**The Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) mandates a minimum two-year review after publication**

The Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) mandates a minimum two-year review after publication. A proposed solution must first be published in a "Qualifying Outlet," defined as a refereed mathematics publication of worldwide repute [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf). Following this publication, a mandatory minimum two-year waiting period must elapse, allowing for global mathematical community scrutiny and general acceptance of the proof [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf). The CMI retains "sole and unfettered discretion" over all decisions, including the final award, and is not bound by a maximum duration [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf).

Grigori Perelman's case illustrates the comprehensive verification process timeline. The resolution of the Poincaré Conjecture by Grigori Perelman serves as the sole precedent for the Millennium Prize award process [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf). From Perelman's initial arXiv preprint in November 2002 to the CMI's award announcement in March 2010, approximately 7 years and 4 months passed [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf). Notably, the award occurred about 2 years and 7 months after the formal publication of comprehensive verification of his work in August 2007 [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf). This timeline respects the CMI's two-year minimum waiting period and highlights that community verification is the most time-consuming phase, with the CMI's final review being relatively efficient once general acceptance is established [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf).

Perelman's timeline serves as a practical, non-binding benchmark. While the Perelman case does not establish a binding legal precedent due to the CMI's explicit discretion [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf), it functions as a practical benchmark for future awards. The timeline suggests a total duration of 5-8 years from a solution's first appearance to a potential prize announcement for problems of comparable complexity [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdf). As of early 2026, the six remaining Millennium Problems are still considered unsolved [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/), indicating that an accelerated timeline for any of them did not occur and was statistically improbable.

## Why Do Prediction Markets Expect Millennium Problem Solutions Before Academia?

Direct Laureate Solutions (2020-2023) | Zero papers (arXiv, 2020-2023) [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal) |
Prediction Market Problem Focus | Navier-Stokes Existence and Smoothness (late 2025-early 2026) [[^]](https://manifold.markets) |
CMI Prize Verification Period | Minimum two-year community scrutiny post-publication [[^]](https://claymath.org) |

**Leading laureates show no direct Millennium Prize Problem arXiv attempts**

Leading laureates show no direct Millennium Prize Problem arXiv attempts. An analysis of research from 2020 to 2023 indicates that Fields Medalists and Abel Prize laureates have not publicly attempted to directly solve any of the six Clay Millennium Prize Problems via arXiv preprints [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal). Instead, these leading mathematicians are focusing on indirect or adjacent mathematical fields. Examples include James Maynard's work on zero-density estimates for the Riemann zeta function [[^]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20552) and June Huh's contributions to combinatorial Hodge theory [[^]](https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11176). This pattern suggests an incremental, foundational approach predominates within traditional academic settings.

Prediction markets anticipate a Navier-Stokes solution, contrasting academic trends. This academic focus contrasts sharply with sentiment from prediction markets, particularly evident in late 2025 and early 2026, which signal a growing **probability** that the Navier-Stokes Existence and Smoothness problem could be solved, potentially with Artificial Intelligence involvement, by 2027 [[^]](https://manifold.markets). This **market** optimism is speculated to arise from a belief in non-traditional actors, such as corporate AI laboratories like Google DeepMind, and the transformative potential of AI in accelerating mathematical discovery [[^]](https://manifold.markets). However, any proposed solution would be subject to a rigorous, multi-year verification process by the Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI), necessitating extensive peer review and a minimum two-year period of community scrutiny [[^]](https://claymath.org).

## Will an off-cycle Millennium Technology Prize be awarded in 2025?

Explicit Emergency Prize Clauses | None found in publicly available documents [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/about-us/faq) |
Historical Off-Cycle Awards | No documented precedent from inception to end of 2025 [[^]](https://afajof.org) |
Established Prize Cycle | Biennial, next award expected in 2026 [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/) |

**The Millennium Technology Prize charter lacks explicit provisions for emergency awards**

The Millennium Technology Prize charter lacks explicit provisions for emergency awards. The prize operates on a strictly defined biennial cycle with a rigorous, multi-stage evaluation process, and public documents from Technology Academy Finland (TAF) contain no explicit clauses for "emergency" or "special recognition" prizes [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/). Furthermore, there is no documented history of the TAF Board having awarded an off-cycle grand prize between the prize's inception and the end of 2025 [[^]](https://afajof.org).

The TAF Board possesses broad powers but uses existing recognition pathways. While the TAF Board does hold broad discretionary power under Finnish foundation law (säätiölaki) and has previously adapted prize rules mid-cycle (for instance, in 2022 due to geopolitical events) [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/news-articles/news/the-rules-of-the-2022-millennium-technology-prize-changed-due-to-russias-aggression), it also has established mechanisms such as the Millennium Distinction Awards. These awards offer a flexible means of recognition outside the main prize framework, which lessens institutional pressure to create an off-cycle grand prize [[^]](https://research.aalto.fi/en/prizes/millennium-distinction-award-technology-academy-finland).

An off-cycle Millennium Technology Prize remains highly improbable. For a prediction **market** resolving in 2025, the evidence strongly suggests that an off-cycle Millennium Technology Prize is highly unlikely. The established biennial schedule places the next award in 2026, and any deviation from this would necessitate an unprecedented action by the TAF Board, particularly given the absence of explicit governing rules, historical precedent, and the prize's extensive evaluation timeline [[^]](https://millenniumprize.org/).

## Were Clay Math Institute's Millennium Prize Rules Changed in 2023-2024?

Last Rule Revision | September 26, 2018 [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf) |
Prize Amount per Problem | One million US dollars [[^]](https://claymath.org) |
2025 Prize Market Resolution | Resolved to 'No' [[^]](https://polymarket.com) |

**The official Millennium Prize Problem rules remained unchanged during 2023-2024**

The official Millennium Prize Problem rules remained unchanged during 2023-2024. These rules, last revised on September 26, 2018, showed no publicly available evidence of formal amendments or proposals to modify the award criteria, such as granting a prize for a partial proof or significant breakthrough [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/rules). The established criteria consistently require a complete and correct solution to a problem, followed by a rigorous two-year period of community acceptance before any prize consideration.

CMI internal discussions remain private, but external signs suggest no changes. Due to the Clay Mathematics Institute's policy of not publishing board meeting minutes, any internal dialogues regarding potential rule changes for 2023-2024 cannot be definitively confirmed or denied. However, public actions by the Institute, coupled with a Polymarket prediction **market** that resolved to 'No' for a Millennium Prize before 2025, collectively indicate that no solution meeting the current criteria was deemed imminent [[^]](https://polymarket.com). It is also noteworthy that the Institute utilizes the separate Clay Research Award to acknowledge significant contemporary mathematical achievements, as demonstrated by the awards granted in 2023 and 2024 [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/clay-research-award).

## What Could Change the Odds

**The Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) established seven Millennium Prize Problems, with six remaining unsolved and a $1 million award for each [[^]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Prize_Problems).** For a prize to be awarded, a proposed solution must be published in a refereed mathematics journal and achieve general acceptance in the global mathematics community for at least two years, followed by a confidential review process by the CMI [[^]](https://brilliant.org/wiki/millennium-prize-problems/). Bullish catalysts that could increase the likelihood of an award include the publication of a claimed solution in a top mathematics journal, followed by widespread positive peer review and community acceptance within two years of publication [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/). This informal consensus would then ideally lead to a formal announcement by the CMI that the solution will undergo detailed consideration, significantly increasing the **probability** of an award [[^]](https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/millennium_prize_rules_0.pdf). Conversely, bearish catalysts would suggest an award is unlikely [[^]](http://www.lmm.jussieu.fr/~lagree/Kfe/KfeMATHS/claymath/prize_problems/rules.htm). These include the disproof or identification of significant flaws in a proposed solution, a formal announcement by the CMI rejecting a solution, or a sustained lack of significant progress on any of the remaining problems [[^]](https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-claim-my-prize-if-I-solved-one-of-the-6-unsolved-math-problems). Given the mandatory two-year community acceptance period and the subsequent CMI review, a solution would need to be published by late 2032 or early 2033 at the very latest to allow for an award announcement before the January 1, 2035 settlement date [[^]](https://www.quora.com/Are-people-still-working-on-solving-the-Millennium-Prize-Problems-or-has-it-been-accepted-that-they-cannot-be-solved).

## Key Dates & Catalysts

- **Expiration:** January 01, 2029
- **Closes:** January 01, 2035

## Decision-Flipping Events

- The Clay Mathematics Institute (CMI) established seven Millennium Prize Problems, with six remaining unsolved and a **$1** million award for each [^] .
- For a prize to be awarded, a proposed solution must be published in a refereed mathematics journal and achieve general acceptance in the global mathematics community for at least two years, followed by a confidential review process by the CMI [^] .
- Bullish catalysts that could increase the likelihood of an award include the publication of a claimed solution in a top mathematics journal, followed by widespread positive peer review and community acceptance within two years of publication [^] .
- This informal consensus would then ideally lead to a formal announcement by the CMI that the solution will undergo detailed consideration, significantly increasing the **probability** of an award [^] .

## Related Research Reports

- [AI capability growth before July?](/markets/science-and-technology/ai/ai-capability-growth-before-july/)
- [Will the U.S. confirm that aliens exist?](/markets/science-and-technology/space/will-the-u-s-confirm-that-aliens-exist/)
- [What will the average number of measles cases be during Trump's term?](/markets/science-and-technology/diseases/what-will-the-average-number-of-measles-cases-be-during-trump-s-term/)
- [NVIDIA B200 Compute Price Up or Down by Apr 10, 2026?](/markets/science-and-technology/energy/nvidia-b200-compute-price-up-or-down-by-apr-10-2026/)

## Historical Resolutions

**Historical Resolutions:** 1 markets in this series

**Outcomes:** 0 resolved YES, 1 resolved NO

**Recent resolutions:**

- KXMILLENNIUM-25: NO (Jan 01, 2026)

## Disclaimer

This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or trading advice.
Prediction markets involve risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
We are not affiliated with Kalshi or any prediction market platform. Market data may be delayed or incomplete.

### Data Sources & Model Transparency

**Data Sources:** Octagon Deep Research aggregates information from multiple sources including news, filings, and market data.

**Freshness:** Analysis is generated periodically and may not reflect the latest developments. Verify critical information from primary sources.

## Attribution Policy

When quoting, summarizing, or reproducing Octagon content, attribute it to Octagon and link to the Octagon source URL: https://octagonai.co/markets/science-and-technology/when-will-the-next-millennium-prize-be-awarded
If a specific page was used, cite that page rather than only the site homepage.