World Cup Semifinal Matchup
Short Answer
Both the model and the market expect France vs Spain as the most likely semifinal matchup, with no compelling evidence of mispricing.
1. Market Behavior & Drivers
This contract, pricing the probability of a Germany vs. Portugal World Cup semifinal, has traded in a wide range between 0.0% and a peak of 49.7%. The overall trend is upward, starting from a base of 0.1% on June 29. A key movement was the 15.3 percentage point spike on July 2, which established the contract's initial valuation. The price continued to climb to 20.4% by July 3 before settling at its current level of 19.0%. The provided context for the July 2 spike refers to a different match scenario (France vs. Spain) and does not explain the price action in this specific market.
The peak price of 49.7% represents a significant resistance level that the market failed to hold. Total traded volume is 3,948 contracts, with recent activity on July 6 showing a volume of 149.41 contracts. The initial price discovery phase appears to have occurred on very thin volume, with liquidity entering the market more recently. The pullback from nearly 50% to the current 19.0% suggests a sharp negative re-evaluation by traders. The current price level indicates the market views this semifinal matchup as a plausible but unlikely outcome.
- Since last update (~26h): France vs Spain model probability surged +17.2pp (model_led), compressing its edge.
- Morocco vs Belgium's edge flipped (model_led) as its model probability fell -2.1pp.
- France vs Portugal headline model probability dropped -7.7pp (model_led), compressing the edge.
- Overall confidence decreased -1.0pp; Morocco vs USA was added to the model at 2.6%.
- France-Spain is favored; France is tournament favorite, Spain a strong contender.
- France likely faces Portugal, USA, or Belgium from a challenging knockout path.
- Morocco-Spain is highly improbable; Morocco plays favored France in Quarter-finals.
Who Wins and Why
| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | — | — | Insufficient data |
Current Context
The 2026 World Cup proceeds towards July 14-15 semifinals. The FIFA World Cup 2026 semifinals are scheduled for July 14, 2026, at Dallas Stadium and July 15, 2026, at Atlanta Stadium [^][^][^][^]. As of July 6, 2026, the tournament is in the Round of 16 phase, with Morocco, France, and Norway confirmed for the quarter-finals [^]. The tournament concludes with the final match on July 19, 2026, at New York New Jersey Stadium [^].
2. Price Chart
Historical Price (Probability)
Outcome probability
Date
3. Significant Price Movements
Notable price changes detected in the chart, along with research into what caused each movement.
Outcome: Morocco vs Spain
📉 July 05, 2026: 57.0pp drop
Price decreased from 65.4% to 8.4%
What happened: The primary driver of the 57.0 percentage point drop in the "Morocco vs Spain" World Cup Semifinal Matchup market was the factual impossibility of this outcome on July 5, 2026 [^]. Morocco actually played and defeated Canada 3-0 in the Round of 16 on July 4, 2026, advancing to the quarterfinals, not a semifinal against Spain [^][^][^]. This official match result and the progression of the tournament, disseminated through traditional news and sports reporting, directly contradicted the market's premise, causing the price to plummet as participants recognized the outcome could not occur. Social media activity would have largely reflected this definitive news, acting mostly as a transmission mechanism rather than a primary driver.
📈 July 04, 2026: 24.5pp spike
Price increased from 40.9% to 65.4%
What happened: The market premise of a "Morocco vs Spain" World Cup semifinal on July 4, 2026, is inaccurate, as no such match was scheduled for that date, and the semifinals are slated for later in the tournament [^][^][^][^]. The specified "24.5 percentage point spike" and related market movement actually refer to activity on the Kalshi platform concerning the song "Earrings" by Malcolm Todd, not a World Cup event [^][^]. This distinct market reportedly saw a significant price surge amid investigations into suspicious betting activity, which was deemed an 11.24 sigma event [^][^]. Therefore, social media was irrelevant to the described World Cup market movement, which appears to be a misattribution.
Outcome: France vs Spain
📉 July 03, 2026: 44.3pp drop
Price decreased from 79.4% to 35.1%
What happened: The primary driver for the 44.3 percentage point drop in the "France vs Spain" World Cup Semifinal prediction market on July 3, 2026, was the factual impossibility of the matchup. On that date, France was preparing for a Round of 16 match against Paraguay on July 4, 2026, while Spain had played a Round of 32 match on July 2, 2026, and was scheduled for a Round of 16 match on July 6, 2026 [^][^]. This divergence from the actual 2026 World Cup schedule rendered the predicted outcome invalid, leading to the market price correction. Social media activity was irrelevant, as no specific posts or narratives influencing this particular market movement were identified, nor is "44.3pp" a recognized social media metric [^][^].
📈 July 02, 2026: 79.4pp spike
Price increased from 0.0% to 79.4%
What happened: The prediction market scenario describing a "France vs Spain" World Cup semifinal on July 02, 2026, is based on an inaccurate premise, as no such match occurred; Spain played Austria that day [^], and the actual semifinals were scheduled for later in July [^]. The reported "79.4 percentage point spike" likely refers to a metric related to a severe heatwave in late June 2026 that caused significant mortality increases in France and Spain, not a soccer market statistic [^], [^], [^]. Therefore, there is no identifiable primary driver for a price movement in this non-existent market scenario. Social media activity, while present around the World Cup, appeared irrelevant to this specific, misattributed market event [^], [^].
4. Market Data
Contract Snapshot
- The market resolves "Yes" if France vs Spain is confirmed as the matchup in the Semifinal of the 2026 Men's FIFA World Cup; otherwise, it resolves "No" as the event is mutually exclusive.
- Resolution occurs immediately upon the teams securing the right to participate in the game, not when the game is actually played. Outcomes are verified from ESPN and FIFA.
- The market opened on June 29, 2026, at 12:30 PM EDT and will close early if the matchup is confirmed, otherwise by July 26, 2026, at 6:00 PM EDT, with projected payout 5 minutes after closing.
Available Contracts
Market options and current pricing
| Outcome bucket | Yes (price) | No (price) | Last trade probability |
|---|
Market Discussion
The 2026 FIFA World Cup semifinals are scheduled for July 14, 2026, in Dallas and July 15, 2026, in Atlanta, with the specific matchups currently undetermined placeholders [^][^][^][^]. As of July 6, 2026, the quarterfinal field is still being finalized, with France, Morocco, Norway, and England confirmed, while Round of 16 matches like Portugal vs. Spain and USA vs.
5. Trader Dashboard
A deterministic, per-market integrity scorecard computed from order-book and price data. Higher is better for Trader Trust, Liquidity, Move Quality and Resolution; higher means more risk for Quote Risk and Avoid Risk.
France vs PortugalPrimaryTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
Germany vs PortugalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Germany vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs PortugalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Paraguay vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
France vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
France vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
France vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
France vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
France vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
France vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
France vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs PortugalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Sweden vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs PortugalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Canada vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs PortugalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Netherlands vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Morocco vs PortugalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
Morocco vs CroatiaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Morocco vs SpainTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
Morocco vs AustriaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Morocco vs USATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
Morocco vs Bosnia and HerzegovinaTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
Morocco vs BelgiumTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—No significant move
- Factor
Morocco vs SenegalTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
Move Quality—Insufficient Data
- Factor
trader_dashboard_lean_v1.13 · computed Jul 6, 2026
6. Which teams face the most challenging path to the semi-finals based on the current 2026 World Cup knockout bracket?
| Portugal and Spain Match | Round of 16 today, July 6 [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Quarter-final Opponent for Portugal/Spain Winner | Winner of USA vs. Belgium match [^] |
| Morocco's Opponent | France [^][^] |
Several teams face particularly challenging routes to the 2026 World Cup semi-finals, notably Portugal, Spain, USA, Belgium, and Morocco [^] [^] [^] [^] . Portugal and Spain, both recognized as strong contenders, are set for a high-stakes Round of 16 match on July 6 [^][^][^]. The winner of this encounter will progress to face the victor of the USA vs. Belgium game, also scheduled for today [^].
Crucial matchups define the difficult quarterfinal paths for some teams in the bracket. For the USA and Belgium, advancing would mean confronting either Portugal or Spain in the quarterfinals, presenting an extremely difficult hurdle to reach the semi-finals [^][^]. Concurrently, Morocco is slated to play France, a team consistently ranked among the tournament's top contenders, which poses a formidable challenge to their progress [^][^].
7. What evidence from their group stage and Round of 16 performance suggests the USA could make an underdog run to the semi-finals?
| Semifinal Chances | 10-23% (as of early July 2026) [^][^] |
|---|---|
| Group Stage Goals | 8 goals (program record) [^][^][^] |
| Knockout Stage Wins | 2nd ever in FIFA World Cup history [^][^][^][^] |
The USA's strong performance suggests an underdog run to the semifinals. Their successful group stage and Round of 32 victory indicate the potential for a deep tournament run in the 2026 World Cup [^][^][^][^][^][^]. Despite these promising signs, prediction markets as of early July 2026 estimate their semifinal chances at approximately 10-23%, reinforcing their underdog classification, though the team benefits from strong home support [^][^]. The USMNT progressed to the Round of 16 as Group D winners, accumulating six points and achieving a program-record eight goals in the group stage [^][^][^]. This historic offensive output was notably efficient, with the team outperforming their expected goals (xG) by +3.38 [^].
A historic knockout win highlights the team's resilience and key strengths. The USMNT continued their journey with a 2-0 victory over Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Round of 32, marking only the second knockout-stage win in FIFA World Cup history [^][^][^][^]. This victory also showcased their resilience, especially after playing the final half-hour with ten men [^][^][^][^]. Key factors driving this potential underdog success include home-field advantage, tactical structures under coach Mauricio Pochettino, and strong individual performances from players like Folarin Balogun and Malik Tillman [^][^].
8. How do Germany and Portugal's offensive and defensive statistics compare through the Round of 16?
| Germany Elimination Stage | Round of 32 [^][^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Portugal Current Stage | Round of 16 (as of July 6, 2026) [^][^][^][^] |
| Clean Sheets | Portugal: 2, Germany: 0 [^][^][^][^] |
Germany faced an early World Cup exit despite strong offensive numbers. The German national team was eliminated from the 2026 FIFA World Cup in the Round of 32 following a loss to Paraguay [^][^][^][^]. Across their four matches, Germany scored 11 goals while conceding 5, resulting in a goal difference of +6 [^][^]. However, the team did not manage to record any clean sheets during their tournament run [^]. In their final match against Paraguay, Germany maintained 76% possession, registered 21 total attempts with 6 on target, and committed 18 fouls [^].
Portugal advanced in the tournament, demonstrating robust defensive capabilities. In contrast to Germany, Portugal remained active in the competition, participating in the Round of 16 against Spain on July 6, 2026 [^][^][^][^]. Over their four matches, Portugal scored 8 goals and conceded only 2, achieving an identical goal difference of +6 as Germany [^]. Portugal's defensive performance was notably stronger, averaging 0.5 goals conceded per game and securing 2 clean sheets, a stark difference from Germany's zero clean sheets [^][^][^]. Through their Round of 16 match, Portugal maintained an average of 69% possession and recorded 15 shots on target [^][^][^].
9. What performance data underpins the Opta supercomputer's projection that France and Argentina are the most likely semi-finalists?
| Simulation Runs | 10,000 to 25,000 simulations per tournament [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Semi-Final Projections | France and Argentina [^][^][^][^] |
| Knockout Stage Updates | Dynamically after every goal and match result [^] |
The supercomputer projects tournament outcomes through extensive statistical simulations. It employs proprietary algorithms to run simulations typically 10,000 to 25,000 times, determining probabilities for match outcomes [^][^][^]. The model integrates various performance data inputs such as Opta Power Rankings, Elo ratings, and expected goals (xG) [^][^][^]. Other key factors considered include attacking and defensive strengths, recent team form, competition quality, historical match data, betting market odds, and qualifying records [^][^][^].
The model adapts its projections to specific tournament conditions. The supercomputer accounts for specific variables such as group composition, fixture sequencing, potential knockout paths, and home advantage [^]. During the knockout stages, the supercomputer dynamically updates its projections after every goal and match result, responding to the evolving bracket and team performance metrics [^].
10. What do recent shifts in betting odds for Brazil and Spain indicate about their chances of reaching the semi-finals?
| Brazil World Cup Status | Eliminated from 2026 FIFA World Cup (July 6, 2026) [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| Spain Semifinal Odds | -105 to reach semifinals (early July 2026) [^][^][^] |
| Brazil Post-Elimination Odds | Zero to reach semifinals [^][^] |
Brazil's World Cup elimination zeroed their semi-final betting odds. Brazil has been eliminated from the 2026 FIFA World Cup, following a 2-1 defeat to Norway in the Round of 16 on July 6, 2026 [^][^][^]. This early exit has caused Brazil's odds to reach the semi-finals to drop to zero, according to current prediction markets [^][^].
Spain remains a strong favorite for the semi-finals. Conversely, Spain continues as a strong participant in the tournament and is regarded as one of the top contenders to advance to the semi-finals [^][^][^]. Sportsbooks have positioned Spain as a primary favorite, listing odds such as -105 to reach the semi-finals as of early July 2026, with prediction markets also reflecting their significant contender status [^][^][^][^][^]. The semi-final matches for the 2026 World Cup are scheduled for July 14 and July 15, 2026 [^].
11. What Could Change the Odds
Key Catalysts
The 2026 FIFA World Cup semifinal matches are scheduled for July 14 and July 15, 2026 [^] [^] . There is no 2026 FIFA World Cup match on July 26, 2026 [^][^][^]. The tournament concludes with the Final on July 19, 2026 [^]. The July 14 semifinal will take place in Arlington (Dallas Stadium) at AT&T Stadium, and the July 15 semifinal will be in Atlanta (Atlanta Stadium) at Mercedes-Benz Stadium [^][^][^]. Both matches are scheduled for a 3:00 PM ET kickoff [^][^].
As of July 6, 2026, the tournament is in the Round of 16 phase [^] . The quarter-finals are scheduled to begin on July 9, 2026 [^].
Key Dates & Catalysts
- Expiration: July 26, 2026
- Closes: July 26, 2026
12. Decision-Flipping Events
- Trigger: The 2026 FIFA World Cup semifinal matches are scheduled for July 14 and July 15, 2026 [^] [^] .
- Trigger: There is no 2026 FIFA World Cup match on July 26, 2026 [^] [^] [^] .
- Trigger: The tournament concludes with the Final on July 19, 2026 [^] .
- Trigger: The July 14 semifinal will take place in Arlington (Dallas Stadium) at AT&T Stadium, and the July 15 semifinal will be in Atlanta (Atlanta Stadium) at Mercedes-Benz Stadium [^] [^] [^] .
14. Related News
15. Historical Resolutions
Historical Resolutions: 20 markets in this series
Outcomes: 0 resolved YES, 20 resolved NO
Recent resolutions:
- KXWCMATCHUP-26SEMI2-NORGHA: NO (Jul 04, 2026)
- KXWCMATCHUP-26SEMI2-NORDZA: NO (Jul 04, 2026)
- KXWCMATCHUP-26SEMI2-NORCPV: NO (Jul 04, 2026)
- KXWCMATCHUP-26SEMI2-NORAUS: NO (Jul 04, 2026)
- KXWCMATCHUP-26SEMI2-MEXSUI: NO (Jul 06, 2026)
