Episode summary
AI Sell-Off: Can Consumers Keep Spending When Stocks Stop Rising?
Summary
The discussion centered on whether markets are pricing too much optimism into AI, growth, and corporate earnings while inflation remains sticky. The host framed the year around two dominant macro forces, oil and AI, and both guests agreed that inflation is likely to stay elevated even as growth momentum may be slowing. One guest argued that markets are increasingly focused on the AI complex because inflation has become a familiar backdrop, while the other said the current setup looks like a mania driven by extrapolation of strong recent earnings into unrealistic future expectations.
A major theme was the consumer. One guest described the U.S. expansion as increasingly “disavings driven,” arguing that household spending is being supported by wealth effects from equities and housing rather than by wage growth alone. The other guest agreed that consumption remains resilient but said labor-market weakness, slower wage growth, and fading asset-price support could eventually pressure spending. Both guests also said the cycle is not a 2008-style credit crisis, because leverage in the financial system is much lower and credit is being extended in different forms.
They split more sharply on bonds and the Fed. One guest said bonds are still unattractive versus cash, though a tactical inflation nowcast has recently turned more supportive. The other guest argued bonds look more favorable versus stocks on a forward-looking basis because markets are pricing extraordinary AI-linked growth that may not materialize.
Key takeaways
- One guest said the market is still shaped mainly by oil and AI, with oil feeding inflation and AI carrying the growth narrative.
- The other guest argued that AI expectations look like a mania because earnings and revenue growth are being extrapolated far beyond what the real economy shows.
- One guest said U.S. consumer spending has shifted from income-driven to disavings-driven, with household wealth helping sustain spending as wages slow.
- The guests agreed the credit system is not set up like 2008, because banks are less levered and more lending now sits in lower-leverage structures.
- One guest said bonds are still worse than cash tactically, but his inflation nowcast has recently improved enough to make bonds a little more attractive.
- The other guest said bonds look better than stocks on a forward basis because the market is pricing much stronger growth than current fundamentals justify.
Notable quotes
“The first has been oil and the second has been AI”
“it seems fairly clear that an inflationary regime is here to stay”
“we are past peak nominal growth”
“Bonds look more favorable to stocks on a forward-looking basis from my perspective”
“If this thing is the most revolutionary technology in the history of Maine, which is what I'm being told and what's getting priced in, you'd think it'd show up”
How the episode opens
Been two big macro team themes. The first has been oil and the second has been AI. — If this thing is the most revolutionary technology in the history of Maine, which is what I'm being told and what's getting priced in, you'd think it'd show up
That it seems fairly clear that an inflationary regime is here to stay. — Bonds look more favorable to stocks on a forward-looking basis from my perspective, — Right? Like is Bob and I disagree on this debt environment of the US economy has totally changed. It's very hard to have a meaningful credit. A lot of it boils down to whether you want to fade the growth expectations or you want to follow the momentum in growth expectations. You're watching Excess Returns. I'm Matt Ziggler, cultist creative in all the places, bringing fire to mankind, founder of Prometheus Research himself, Aan the Hunt. How you doing, Ahan?
I'm good, Matt. I'm always in excited for your introductions. Well, let's just introduce you to our other special guest here, the best empty bookshelf in finance as I just found out. Podcast background connoisseur Bob Elliot. How you doing, Bob?
Thank you so much. — And we should co-founder, CEO, chief investment officer unlimited. You have other things too, but the bookshelf is truly next level. I want to applaud. — Absolutely. Absolutely. Your background. — You know what I think I just to help people they can visualize whatever they want in my bookshelf. So, I'm really, you know, open to to anything. I mean, it's a min minimalist, if not like existential, like attack at the the performative bookshelfing of like, look at my amazing books.
Exactly. — Well, not not your bookshelf, but — Your bookshelf looks like you've read everything there.
From the episode’s captions: roughly the first two minutes, lightly cleaned. Keep watching on YouTube →
Topics
- ai investment boom
- consumer spending vs wages
- fed rates and persistent inflation
- oil vs ai inflation pressures
- bonds vs stocks valuation
Companies and tickers mentioned
- Unlimited
- Prometheus Research
Watch the episode
Watch “AI Sell-Off: Can Consumers Keep Spending When Stocks Stop Rising?” on YouTube
Summary, takeaways and quote selection by Octagon. Quotes are short excerpts; the full conversation is in the episode.
More from Excess Returns
-
An AI Bubble Could Hit Stocks. Inflation Could Hit Bonds. How Do You Diversify and Keep Both? -
Tech Is Priced for a Boom. 86% of the Economy Grew 0.7%. What If AI Slows? -
Tech Is the Cheapest Since 2022. Walmart Is 46 Times Earnings. Where Is the Bubble? -
This $1.5 Trillion Manager Expects More Fed Hikes. So Why Is He Still Bullish? -
AI Stocks Cracked. Margins Could Be Peaking. So Why Is a Liquidity Expert Watching the Debt Wall? -
The AI Trade Is Cracking | Peter Boockvar on What to Own Instead
Excess Returns, this episode and its artwork belong to Excess Returns. Octagon is not affiliated with the show; this page is an independent summary.