Episode summary
Thom Williams on revamping Hawaii ERS: Governance, strategy and long-term vision
Summary
Thom Williams said his biggest accomplishment at Hawaii ERS was shifting investment decision-making away from the board and into a dedicated internal team, paired with stronger governance, accountability, and oversight. He described building out the investment office with a new CIO, risk analytics, legal support, and a more demanding relationship with external managers and consultants so the fund could get value beyond standard reporting.
He also defended ERS’ post-2008 de-risking program, which he said was designed to protect a plan that had lost about a third of its value and fallen to about a 50% funding ratio. Williams argued for “winning by not losing,” using uncorrelated and negatively correlated assets, trend-following strategies, and bonds to reduce downside risk, and said the approach has helped improve the funding ratio and shorten the amortization period to full funding.
Williams also recounted legislative work that protected the plan’s tax status and reduced hidden liabilities. He said he challenged early-retirement cash incentives that could violate IRS rules, won a ruling backing ERS’ position, and later pushed Act 46 to require employers to pay the actuarial present value of restored benefits after wrongful terminations. Looking ahead, he said volatility will persist, but long-term public pension plans are built to endure it.
Key takeaways
- Williams said Hawaii ERS improved governance by delegating investment decisions to professional staff instead of leaving them with the board.
- He said the fund’s post-2008 risk-mitigation mix grew from about 18% to about 30% of the portfolio.
- Williams argued the plan’s goal is “to win by not losing,” favoring steady compounded returns over home-run bets.
- He said Act 46 made employers pay the actuarial present value of restored benefits, limiting new unfunded liabilities.
- Williams said he is not very concerned about market volatility because long-term DB plans are designed to absorb it over time.
Notable quotes
“the investment decision making ought to lie where the expertise exists”
“our goal is to win by not losing”
“the retirement fund was bearing the burden of certain human resource practices that were inappropriate”
“those decisions are are made more rational and impactful and and justifiable when you've weighed all of the the different perspectives”
How the episode opens
Respect the perspectives of others and recognize that there are as many perspectives as there are people and or positions if you will. And to understand and respect to know that the members look at our program and this goes slightly differently than the legislature who has a whole different set of stakeholders and and obligations and our board and staff. uh to respect and and invite all of those perspectives, you have to make some tough decisions in the in the inter room period.
But I think those decisions are are made more rational and impactful and and justifiable when you've weighed all of the the different perspectives that are that are involved. In a lot of instances and particularly in a environment where there is civil service and union representation terminations are subject to arbitration and if one is found to have been terminated improperly you are often times awarded restoration of your job and back pay etc. But there were no rules governing those determination.
There would just be a a a back and forth between the complainant and the employer as to what the provisions of the settlement might be and it was oftent times multiple years of service. I would have worked an additional six or eight years and I would have earned overtime and I would have had these levels of increases. It was all hypothetical and and what would occur is that when these settlements were reached, the employer would send us a communication says give this person 12 years of service and here's the back contributions that we would have paid but without interest or anything.
And what we realized and readily was that there was an actuarial impact on the plan because in many instances this made individuals immediately eligible for.
From the episode’s captions: roughly the first two minutes, lightly cleaned. Keep watching on YouTube →
Topics
- public pension governance
- investment de-risking
- diversification strategy
- legislative risk
- long-term fund health
Watch the episode
Watch “Thom Williams on revamping Hawaii ERS: Governance, strategy and long-term vision” on YouTube
Summary, takeaways and quote selection by Octagon. Quotes are short excerpts; the full conversation is in the episode.
More from Markets Group
-
The €3bn German Allocator Who Said No to Alternatives -
RE West 2026: Valerie Red Horse Mohl of the California Endowment Spoke to Courtney McQuade -
RE West 2026: Steve Biggs of The Mather Group Spoke to Courtney McQuade -
RE West 2026: Martha Delgado of Saint Francis Foundation Spoke to Courtney McQuade -
Two Stints as Interim CIO: Howard Hodel on Risk, Rebalancing and Reassuring the Board -
Stefan Beiner on Repo, Resilience, and Why Governance Beats Prediction in Pension Investing
Markets Group, this episode and its artwork belong to their owners. Octagon is not affiliated with the show; this page is an independent summary.