Episode summary
How Top LPs Pick Venture Funds
How I Invest With David Weisburd
· · 37 min · Hosts: David Weisburd · Guests: Jamie Rhode
Summary
Jamie Rhode argues that venture LPs often make emerging managers look interchangeable by screening them through the same templates: prior firm, network, thesis, track record, and DPI. That pushes managers toward a standardized pitch, so the real job for LPs is to identify “GP-market fit” — the match between a fund’s size, strategy, and the manager’s lived experience that gives them a real edge in sourcing, selecting, and winning deals. He says the best seed managers are not just good investors; they are also good firm builders who know when to hire, when to outsource operations, and when to adapt as the market shifts.
A big theme is that fund ones often have structural advantages because they operate with fewer constraints, while mature funds face LP expectations, ownership targets, and strategy drift. Jamie says the strongest managers stay humble, refresh their networks, and build a founder flywheel that keeps deals flowing even after their original edge fades. He also emphasizes that the best partnerships combine disagreement with respect, because early-stage investing requires people who can challenge each other without creating resentment.
On portfolio construction, Jamie recommends a largely rules-based approach with room for exception: do enough deals to be confident you’ll own a winner, then reserve about 10% for “break-the-rule” bets. For LPs, his warning is simple: don’t let relationship bias keep you in stale managers. If you were seeing the manager fresh today, would you buy again, or should that capital go elsewhere?
Key takeaways
- Jamie Rhode says LPs make emerging managers look the same by forcing a standardized underwriting process built around track record, network, and thesis.
- He argues that GP-market fit matters more than a generic “good strategy,” because fund size, strategy, and lived experience have to align to create an edge.
- Jamie says fund ones often have more upside because they face fewer LP and founder constraints than older firms.
- He recommends roughly 90% rules-based investing and 10% break-the-rule bets to preserve flexibility and capture outlier outcomes.
- Jamie warns LPs that strategy drift and network decay can make a once-good fund a poor re-up, even if the relationship feels comfortable.
- He says the biggest LP mistake is sitting out a vintage year because opportunity cost from missing outliers can be worse than backing the wrong manager.
Notable quotes
“what we call at Screen Door, GP market fit, which means your fund size and your strategy and your lived experiences”
“being a good investor is only half the job. It's being a fund manager and understanding that along that way there may be times that you need to sell a piece off”
“I think being able to disagree but with respect is where I've seen a lot of success happen”
“I think it comes back to what the goal is first of their venture portfolio and how diversified you are and where you're looking to deploy capital going forward”
How the episode opens
Why I get so excited about emerging managers, why I believe there's so much alpha in fund one managers, when you see the interaction of high skill and high volatility in the environment that you're playing in, it creates this moment in time or this place where skill can actually show up in real terms. If you were to come into your Monday deal meeting and have this manager come across as brand new and someone that you had never met before, would you take the meeting?
So, Jamie, you're partner at Screendoor, one of the top LPs in the world. And last time we chatted, you said that a lot of the managers today look exactly the same. What did you mean by that?
It's funny you ask this question because I think it's the LPs' fault, but you have a manager come in your inbox or come through a warm intro and you are ex-product manager, ex-operator, ex-XYZ brand name firm that you're spinning out of or you have ex-network and it's all generally the same. Like, if you were to blind yourself and just hear the story, a lot of it sounds the same, but I think LPs force that. Like, we're looking for something that's an easy underwrite that's fundable.
So, we're all looking for the same thing. Let me see your track record with your co-investor list. Do you have DPI?
I mean, that's that's a huge win. But, let me see what network you have. Let me see what thesis you have, which is really just a sector play, but they call it a thesis.
And so, a lot of LPs just force a standardized way to underwrite a GP, so when you come into my inbox or you come into my network, you all sound the same.
From the episode’s captions: roughly the first two minutes, lightly cleaned. Keep watching on YouTube →
Topics
- lp manager selection
- emerging managers
- gp-market fit
- venture fund strategies
- venture partnerships
Companies and tickers mentioned
- Screendoor
- Verdis Investment Management
- AlphaSense
Watch the episode
Watch “How Top LPs Pick Venture Funds” on YouTube
Summary, takeaways and quote selection by Octagon. Quotes are short excerpts; the full conversation is in the episode.
More from How I Invest With David Weisburd
-
Hunter Walk: Why Venture is Getting Harder, Picking Great Founders, and Investing Against Consensus -
True Anomaly’s Even Rogers on Space Warfare, China’s Military Advantage, and the Defense Tech Boom -
Finding the Next Anthropic, Quantifying Venture Capital, and the Science of Picking Winners -
Why 95% of AI Projects Fail, Anthropic still at $2T?, and Why AI Is Still in the First Inning -
Peter Thiel's 27-Year Partner on the AI Bubble, the Venture Capital Crisis, and the PayPal Mafia -
Why Venture Is Eating Public Markets, Picking Great VCs, and the AI Boom w/Brijesh Jeevarathnam
How I Invest With David Weisburd, this episode and its artwork belong to David Weisburd. Octagon is not affiliated with the show; this page is an independent summary.
