Alaska Senate Election Winner
Short Answer
1. Executive Verdict
- Mary Peltola appears favored due to significant campaign fundraising and spending advantage.
- Dan Sullivan likely remains competitive given Alaska's ranked-choice voting system.
Who Wins and Why
| Outcome | Market | Model | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Peltola | 57.0% | 50.9% | Mary Peltola benefits from incumbency, strong fundraising, and demonstrated cross-party appeal in prior elections. |
| Dan Sullivan | 42.0% | 48.8% | Dan Sullivan benefits from incumbency, strong Republican support in a conservative state, and an established campaign. |
| Ann Diener | 0.1% | 0.1% | Ann Diener appears to have no significant public profile or active campaign to date. |
| Richard Grayson | 0.1% | 0.1% | Richard Grayson appears to have no significant public profile or active campaign to date. |
| Dustin Darden | 0.1% | 0.1% | Dustin Darden appears to have no significant public profile or active campaign to date. |
Current Context
2. Market Behavior & Price Dynamics
Historical Price (Probability)
3. Market Data
Contract Snapshot
The market resolves to 'Yes' for the candidate confirmed as the winner of the 2026 midterm Alaska U.S. Senate election, inclusive of any run-offs, and 'No' for all other candidates. The election is scheduled for November 3, 2026. Resolution relies on all three sources (Associated Press, Fox News, and NBC) calling the same candidate; otherwise, official certification determines the winner. If the election results are not confirmed by July 31, 2027, the market will resolve to 'Other'.
Available Contracts
Market options and current pricing
| Outcome bucket | Yes (price) | No (price) | Last trade probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Peltola | $0.58 | $0.44 | 57% |
| Dan Sullivan | $0.43 | $0.58 | 42% |
| Ann Diener | $0.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Dustin Darden | $0.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Richard Grayson | $0.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate A | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate B | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate C | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate D | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate E | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate F | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate G | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate H | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate I | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate J | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate K | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate L | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate M | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate N | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate O | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate P | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate Q | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate R | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate S | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate T | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate U | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate V | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Candidate W | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
| Other | $1.00 | $1.00 | 0% |
Market Discussion
The market largely discusses the competitive dynamic between Mary Peltola and incumbent Dan Sullivan for the Alaska Senate seat, with traders currently favoring Peltola at 57%. Arguments for Peltola's victory center on her "S-tier appeal," strong name recognition, moderate stance, and potential advantages in ranked-choice voting, supported by recent polling showing a narrow lead. Despite some dissenting opinions, the market's consensus suggests a strong belief in Peltola's chances, citing her momentum from endorsements and grassroots efforts.
4. Trader Dashboard
A deterministic, per-market integrity scorecard computed from order-book and price data. Higher is better for Trader Trust, Liquidity, Move Quality and Resolution; higher means more risk for Quote Risk and Avoid Risk.
Mary PeltolaPrimaryTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Dan SullivanTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Ann DienerTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Dustin DardenTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Richard GraysonTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate ATrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate BTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate CTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate DTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate ETrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate FTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate GTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate HTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate ITrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate JTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate KTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate LTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate MTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate NTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate OTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate PTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate QTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate RTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate STrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate TTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate UTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate VTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
Candidate WTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
OtherTrader Trust—Liquidity—Move Quality—Resolution—Quote Risk—Avoid Risk—
- Factor
trader_dashboard_lean_v1.13 · computed Aug 18, 2026
5. What are the key campaign events and potential catalysts, such as debates or major endorsements, scheduled between the August primary and the November 3, 2026 general election?
| Primary Election Date | August 18, 2026 [^][^][^] |
|---|---|
| General Election Date | November 3, 2026 [^][^][^] |
| Campaign Finance Report Due | October 15, 2026 [^] |
6. How do the final vote totals from the August 18, 2026 primary inform the strategic landscape and relative strengths of the four candidates advancing to the general election?
| Primary Election Date | August 18, 2026 [^] |
|---|---|
| General Election Date | November 3 [^][^] |
| Primary System | Top-four primary [^][^][^][^][^][^][^] |
7. How do the campaign fundraising totals and spending strategies of Dan Sullivan and Mary Peltola compare for the 2026 election cycle?
| Mary Peltola Raised | $18.5 million (as of July 29, 2026) [^][^] |
|---|---|
| Dan Sullivan Raised | $11.7 million (as of July 29, 2026) [^][^] |
| Dan Sullivan Cash-on-Hand | $7.3 million (as of July 29, 2026) [^][^] |
8. What do historical turnout patterns and current voter registration data suggest about the likely composition of the November 2026 electorate in Alaska?
| Independent Voter Registration | 63.4% (as of August 2026) [^] |
|---|---|
| Republican Voter Registration | 23.2% (as of August 2026) [^] |
| Historical Midterm Turnout | 50.2% to 54.8% (2002-2022) [^][^][^] |
9. What does public polling conducted after the August 18 primary indicate about voters' second-choice preferences under Alaska's ranked-choice system?
| Post-primary second-choice polling data | Not available [^][^] |
|---|---|
| Primary election date | August 18, 2026 (non-ranked) [^][^][^] |
| General election system | Ranked-choice voting (top four candidates) [^][^][^] |
10. What Could Change the Odds
Key Catalysts
Key Dates & Catalysts
- Closes: November 03, 2026
11. Decision-Flipping Events
- Trigger: The 2026 Alaska U.S.
- Trigger: Senate election includes a nonpartisan top-four primary on August 18, 2026, leading to a general election on November 3, 2026, which will utilize ranked-choice voting [^] [^] [^] .
- Trigger: Republican incumbent Senator Dan S.
- Trigger: Sullivan and Democratic former U.S.
13. Historical Resolutions
No historical resolution data available for this series.